USC
SOA
A statement from the American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS), Student Association of Woman Architects (SAWA), and the Nation Organization of Minority Architects (NOMAS) to the administration of the University of Southern California School of Architecture:
BIPOC
WOMEN
LGBTQ+
INT'L
PEOPLE
Comprehensive Diversity
Initiative
It is no secret that BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color), Women, LGBTQ+, and people with disabilities have long been discriminated against as both citizens in the built environment and as professionals in the field of architecture. We believe that educational institutions, including USC, play a key role in combating these inequalities. Student organizations AIAS, NOMAS, and SAWA have devised this Comprehensive Diversity Initiative to facilitate the reconstruction of the USC School of Architecture curriculum and community to be more representative, inclusive, and empowering of systematically-marginalized groups.
The current exclusion of BIPOC, Women, and LGBTQ+ designs from educational content at USC is a gross oversight that not only negatively impacts the education quality of ALL students, but also discourages participation by marginalized groups. By designing a representative education, we will create a safe, nurturing environment for underrepresented students to talk about and confront the issues surrounding inequality-- an approach that will simultaneously encourage them to succeed both in the classroom and as professionals. We see these changes as a continuation of the “Citizen Architect” concept championed by Dean Curry, via the promotion of understanding, respect, and collaboration with BIPOC, Women, LGBTQ+, and disabled communities. We understand that there are specific minimum NCARB requirements each class must meet, but as a premier architecture institution, USC has a duty to reach beyond the minimum requirements of education and engage its student body in a discussion of the impact of our designs on ALL communities. The impact of architecture on underrepresented groups and communities should comprise the foundation of architecture education at USC in both theory and practice.
Moving forwards, we have two goals: (1) To increase BIPOC, Women, LGBTQ+, disabled, and international perspectives in the content taught at the foundational levels of the USC architecture education and (2) To equip all students, regardless of Race, Nationality, background, or gender identity, with the ability to design spaces in the best interests of underprivileged communities, specifically to improve the spatial experience of systematically-marginalized groups.
These goals are central to reforming the student experience at the School of Architecture. It is past time we reevaluated our community standards not only to support Black students, but to improve the educational quality and experience for all students regardless of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Ability, or National Origin. Students shared their experiences with discrimination in the SOA through our survey, and this Comprehensive Diversity Initiative reflects their comments, complaints, and hopes for the future. It is our hope that enacting these inclusive policies will bring concrete change to our community and uplift the diverse student voices that comprise it.
5.
Financial support for any student for whom printing, model building, or software constitutes an obstacle to learning
Inability to afford materials is an obstacle that tends to disproportionately affect students of color, and can therefore dissuade BIPOC students from entering or remaining in the program.
The following have supported and signed this initiative:
USC Student Association of Woman Architects
USC American Institute of Architecture Students
USC National Organization of Minority Architecture Students
Andronicus Chapter of Alpha Rho Chi Fraternity
USC Undergraduate Architecture Student Council
USC Graduate Architecture Student Association
USC American Society of Landscape Architects
Abriannah Aiken, Class of 2021
Erin Light, Class of 2023
Katie Hayes, Class of 2021
Justin Wan, Class of 2022
Darwin Hu, Class of 2022
Katie Denti, Class of 2020
Juan Villatoro Class of 2022
Mel Lewis
Daniele Burns, Class of 2022
Maria Fernanda Furlan, Prospective Student.
Esra Daghestani, Class of 2021
Edgar Devora-Roman, Class of 2024
Andreas Papadopoulos, Prospective Student
Naomi Hicks
Ten Francis, Class of 2020
Chelsea Heckenkamp, Class of 2021
Cassius Palacio, Prospective Student, Class of 2026
Maddy Campbell, Class of 2020
Julia Mosher, Class of 2022
Stephanie Saunders, Class of 2022
Brian Ulaszewski, class of 2000
Cassie Vasquez, Class of 2023
Cassie Vasquez, Class of 2023
Kate Bogdanova, Class of 2021
Lala Nikola, Class of 2023
Angelina Lim, Class of 2022
Ryan von Keyserling, Class of 2023
Nisreen Tarbell, Class of 2022
Annabelle Asali, Class of 2023
Nastassja Lafontant, Class of 2021
Esmeralda Aceituno, Class of 2023
Carol-Ann Lucas, Class of 2021
Annabelle Asali, Class of 2023
Bettina Brown, Class of 2021
Valerie Taranto, Class of 2022
Chaila Johnson, Class of 2021
Ashley Onyeador, Class of 2023
Tori Smolinski, Class of 2022
Diana Perez, Class of 2023
Skyler Rosin, Class of 2023
Sofija Radulovic, Class of 2022
Sung Joon Yun, Class of 2022
Marshall Davis III, Class of 2021
Elena Prafo Class of 2023
Katherine Villa-Fuerte, Class of 2023
Zoe Jackson
Esmeralda Aceituno, Class of 2023
Radha J.Murumkar, Class 4th year of B.Arch
Laylah Fairley, Class of 2024
Ayse Artun, Class of 2023
Isabella Rendon, Class of 2024
Mary Elizabeth Pérez, class of 2021
Kaitelyn Haynes, Class of 2024
Emily Huang, Class of 2023
Heidy Garcia, Class of 2022
Michelle Ramirez, Class of 2024
Rose Li, Class of 2024
Sam Gherrity, Class of 2021
Liem Tran, Class of 2021
Mel Lewis class of 2021
JP Luikart
Thomas Ramirez, Class of 2022